Publications
Publications by categories in reversed chronological order. Please get in touch via email if you cannot access any publications but want a copy.
2024
- Article
Beyond words: How visual imagery shapes collaborative sensemaking in entrepreneurial ecosystemsBernd Wurth, and Suzanne MawsonJournal of Business Venturing Insights, 2024Entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) are complex social systems dependent on connectivity and shared understanding between diverse actors. An often used, albeit oversimplified view, implies that diverse actors connect, collaborate and contribute to the EE in an almost frictionless way. However, this perspective overlooks the need for deeper forms of communication that can shift actors’ perceptions, goals and motivations to trigger meaningful change. Recent research has highlighted the role of conversations, narratives and stories in developing (informal) institutions and shared understandings. What is missing from this discussion, however, are non-verbal forms of communication, which enable interpretation, support meaning-making and help implementation. This paper draws on communicative institutionalism theory and empirical observations from a larger participatory action research project. We discuss how visuals support richer interpretation of ambiguities, different perspectives and collaborative sensemaking. Images act as boundary objects enabling creative associations, revealing assumptions and catalysing explorative dialogue through inherent ambiguity. Representing complex concepts visually facilitates participant engagement over time. The co-creative process of iterative illustration also captures shared meaning as it emerges. Implications highlight visuals’ potential for fostering future-oriented dialogue, reflective practice and embodied institutions fundamental for EEs. From this, we outline suggestions for further research and practice.
@article{wurmaw24, title = {Beyond words: How visual imagery shapes collaborative sensemaking in entrepreneurial ecosystems}, author = {Wurth, Bernd and Mawson, Suzanne}, journal = {Journal of Business Venturing Insights}, volume = {21}, pages = {e00458}, year = {2024}, doi = {10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00458}, google_scholar_id = {2P1L_qKh6hAC}, } - Article
Not seeing the forest for the trees? A systems approach to the entrepreneurial universityBernd Wurth, Niall MacKenzie, and Susan HowickSmall Business Economics, 2024The idea and practice of the entrepreneurial university has emerged in response to growing expectations of universities contributing to economic development and has, in turn, been subject to a growing body of research. However, much of the work is focused on individual activities or institutions, typically overemphasising commercialisation activities and certain types of universities. Furthermore, much of this research is de-contextualised and does not consider the systems in which universities operate. As a result, we have a variety of unit theories of constituent parts of the entrepreneurial university without considering the wider (feedback) effects and implications — in other words: we are, in effect, not seeing the forest for the trees. Drawing on in-depth quantitative and qualitative field work and the literature, we develop a programmatic theory of the entrepreneurial university and the institutionalised entrepreneurial activities. Using causal loop diagrams, we capture the systemness and the interdependencies between universities’ entrepreneurial activities and their dynamic capabilities. The model highlights how universities are part of a larger system and how this influences their external engagement activities. The result is a more holistic understanding of entrepreneurial universities that reconciles existing work and guides future research. We discuss practical implications and policy levers derived from this systemic perspective.
@article{wurmachow24, title = {Not seeing the forest for the trees? A systems approach to the entrepreneurial university}, author = {Wurth, Bernd and MacKenzie, Niall and Howick, Susan}, journal = {Small Business Economics}, volume = {63}, number = {2}, pages = {673--696}, year = {2024}, doi = {10.1007/s11187-023-00864-1}, dimensions = {true}, google_scholar_id = {70eg2SAEIzsC}, } - Chapter
Combining SD & ABM: Frameworks, benefits, challenges, and future research directionsSusan Howick, Itamar Megiddo, Le Khanh Ngan Nguyen, and 2 more authors, Cham, 2024System Dynamics (SD) and Agent-Based modelling (ABM) are two commonly used simulation methods with different characteristics and benefits. When tackling a complex problem, the use of one of these methods may be insufficient and, instead, a combination of the two methods in a hybrid simulation may be required. To support modellers in the development of SD-ABM hybrid simulations, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of methodological and practical considerations. Frameworks are presented to facilitate the implementation of hybrid SD-ABM models including the development of a conceptual SD-ABM hybrid model. The chapter then presents key benefits associated with SD-ABM hybrid modelling, which include being able to model an appropriate level of complexity, facilitate communication of the model design, enhance confidence building and reduce compute intensity. Two case studies are used to illustrate these benefits. Although there are many benefits, there are also key challenges associated with the development of a SD-ABM hybrid model and these are discussed. The chapter concludes with a discussion of opportunities and areas for future research.
@inbook{howmegngu24, title = {Combining SD & ABM: Frameworks, benefits, challenges, and future research directions}, booktitle = {Hybrid Modeling and Simulation: Conceptualizations, Methods, and Applications}, author = {Howick, Susan and Megiddo, Itamar and Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan and Wurth, Bernd and Kazakov, Rossen}, editor = {Fakhimi, M. and Mustafee, Navonil}, publisher = {Springer}, location = {Cham}, year = {2024}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-59999-6_9}, google_scholar_id = {ldfaerwXgEUC}, }
2023
- Article
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem MechanismsBernd Wurth, Erik Stam, and Ben SpigelFoundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, also published as a book (ISBN: 978-1-63828-256-3) , 2023Entrepreneurial ecosystems have developed from a powerful idea and concept into a transdisciplinary research program, increasing our understanding into entrepreneurship-led development and providing actionable knowledge for improving the conditions for entrepreneurship and development. In this monograph we take stock of the progress to date and synthesize the findings of 181 empirical scientific entrepreneurial ecosystem studies through a systematic literature review. We organize the review around five key mechanisms that explain the nature and development of entrepreneurial ecosystems: (1) interdependence of its elements, (2) upward causation explaining entrepreneurial ecosystem outputs and (3) outcomes, (4) downward causation and path dependence, and (5) inter-ecosystem links. We summarize the findings and outline opportunities for research and discuss policy implications in the light of a transdisciplinary entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. This monograph is of interest for scholars of all academic disciplines that provide knowledge that is relevant for the understanding of entrepreneurial ecosystems, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship-led development, but also for all stakeholders involved in the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems.
@article{wurstaspi23, title = {Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Mechanisms}, author = {Wurth, Bernd and Stam, Erik and Spigel, Ben}, journal = {Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship}, volume = {19}, number = {3}, pages = {224--339}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.1561/0300000089}, google_scholar_id = {35N4QoGY0k4C}, }
2022
- Article
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research ProgramBernd Wurth, Erik Stam, and Ben SpigelEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2022Entrepreneurial ecosystems have become a prominent concept, yet in its current state, the concept itself represents a paradox. While it draws on a rich intellectual history and provides an opportunity to synthesize different strands of research, it is also under-theorized and the mechanisms that govern ecosystem evolution are not well understood. This paper takes stock of recent advancements in ecosystem scholarship and synthesizes the empirical reality of the causal mechanisms. We use these dynamics to position ecosystems in a broader context, within and beyond the domain of entrepreneurship research, and propose a transdisciplinary research program for ecosystem research and practice.
@article{wurstaspi22, title = {Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program}, author = {Wurth, Bernd and Stam, Erik and Spigel, Ben}, journal = {Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice}, volume = {46}, number = {3}, pages = {729--778}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1177/1042258721998948}, dimensions = {true}, google_scholar_id = {J_g5lzvAfSwC}, } - Article
OR for Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Problem-Oriented Review and AgendaElias G. Carayannis, Evangelos Grigoroudis, and Bernd WurthEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2022Innovation-driven entrepreneurship has become a focus for economic development and received increasing attention from policy makers and academics over the last decades. While consensus has been reached that context matters for innovation and entrepreneurship, little evidence and decision support exists for policy makers to effectively shape the environment for growth-oriented companies. We present the entrepreneurial ecosystem concept as a complex systems-based approach to the study of innovation-driven entrepreneurial economies. The concept, in combination with novel data sources, offers new opportunities for research and policy, but also comes with new challenges. The aim of this paper is to take stock of the literature and build bridges for more transdisciplinary research. First, we review emergent trends in ecosystem research and provide a typology of four overarching problems based on current limitations. These problems connect operational research scholars to the context and represent focal points for their contributions. Second, we review the operational research literature and provide an overview of how these problems have been addressed and outline opportunities for future research, both for the specific problems as well as cross-cutting themes. Operational research has been invaluable in supporting decision-makers facing complex problems in several fields. This paper provides a conceptual and methodological agenda to increase its contribution to the study and governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems.
@article{cargriwur22, title = {OR for Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Problem-Oriented Review and Agenda}, author = {Carayannis, Elias G. and Grigoroudis, Evangelos and Wurth, Bernd}, journal = {European Journal of Operational Research}, volume = {300}, number = {3}, pages = {791--808}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.030}, google_scholar_id = {vV6vV6tmYwMC}, }
2019
- Article
Thriving in a new patent world: Mitigating the unintended consequences of the America Invents ActJ. Michael Munson, W. Austin Spivey, and Bernd WurthCogent Business & Management, 2019Our article epitomizes systems thinking not only to identify possible unintended consequences of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), but also to offer suggestions mitigating their impact. Employing two-loop, generic system archetypes, our intent is to help stakeholders in intellectual property (IP) understand some of the nuances influencing the patent lifecycle linked to AIA. Building on the lingua franca used in patent law, our article highlights four important changes: being the first-to-file for protection; eliminating best mode disclosure; expanding the definition of prior art; and expanding post-grant review. Armed with a better understanding of the system issues imbedded in the legislation, innovators and entrepreneurs can develop strategies to deal with the attendant issues. For example, the tragedy of the commons associated with first-to-file highlights the need to increase R&D resources; else, over time incremental innovation will inevitably dominate efforts to modify the patent portfolio. Overall, AIA represents a step forward in harmonizing the US with the rest of the world while it increases the transparency of the legal maze that remains patent law; however, the changes bring allocation issues, secrecy, and time pressure to the forefront of the conversation about new product development. Recognition of these impacts is relevant worldwide for anyone contemplating a US patent or any entity attempting to maintain a viable portfolio of intellectual property.
@article{munspiwur19, title = {Thriving in a new patent world: Mitigating the unintended consequences of the America Invents Act}, author = {Munson, J. Michael and Spivey, W. Austin and Wurth, Bernd}, journal = {Cogent Business & Management}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {1632567}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1080/23311975.2019.1632567}, google_scholar_id = {BqipwSGYUEgC}, }
2014
- Article
Implications of the America Invents Act for R&D Managers: Connecting the Patent Life Cycle with the Technology Development ProcessW. Austin Spivey, J. Michael Munson, and Bernd WurthResearch-Technology Management, 2014Protecting intellectual property is crucial for R&D managers. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which overhauled the US patent system in order to reduce litigation and bring US patent practices into line with international systems, offers new opportunities and challenges in this arena. AIA focuses on improving efficiency, increasing transparency, and harmonizing with other national patent regimes. In pursuit of these aims, the law introduced several key changes: eliminating the requirement for “best mode” disclosure, expanding the definition of prior art, moving from first-to-invent to first-to-file as the key criteria for patent eligibility, and adding post-grant review, among others. Using two familiar frameworks, the patent life cycle and the Stage-Gate model for new product development, the paper explores how AIA impacts R&D managers’ considerations around intellectual property. The law comes with added risks for R&D managers, who now must evaluate the commercial potential of innovation much earlier (with a larger set of stakeholders), while maintaining more secrecy than was required under the old regime. The demands of AIA require that R&D managers become more important members of the enterprise’s strategic team.
@article{spimunwur14, title = {Implications of the America Invents Act for R&D Managers: Connecting the Patent Life Cycle with the Technology Development Process}, author = {Spivey, W. Austin and Munson, J. Michael and Wurth, Bernd}, journal = {Research-Technology Management}, volume = {57}, number = {5}, pages = {43--51}, year = {2014}, doi = {10.5437/08956308X5705255}, dimensions = {true}, google_scholar_id = {Zph67rFs4hoC}, }
